北京大学医学部机构知识库
Advanced  
IR@PKUHSC  > 北京大学第一临床医学院  > 放射治疗科  > 期刊论文
学科主题: 放射医学
题名:
64层螺旋CT与冠状动脉血管造影评估冠状动脉侧支循环的对照研究
其他题名: Evaluation of the coronary collateral circulation with 64-sUce spiral CT: a comparative study with coronary angiography
作者: 邱建星; 王继琛; 唐光健; 刘建新; 蒋学祥
关键词: 侧支循环 ; 体层摄影术 ; X线计算机 ; 血管造影术 ; Collateral circulation ; Tomography,X-ray computed ; Angiography
刊名: 中华放射学杂志
发表日期: 2009
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1201.2009.04.007
卷: 43, 期:4, 页:360-364
收录类别: 中国科技核心期刊 ; 中文核心期刊 ; CSCD
文章类型: Journal Article
摘要: 目的 评估64层螺旋CT(MSCT)显示冠状动脉侧支循环(CCC)的能力.方法 回顾性分析2005年8月至2007年4月间接受64层MSCT冠状动脉成像(64-MSCTA)且影像质量良好的患者,经冠状动脉造影(CAG)证实至少有1支冠状动脉主要分支狭窄程度≥90%.以Rentrop评价标准为金标准,评价64-MSCTA判断CCC的准确性.在CAG影像上按照Wemer冠状动脉侧支连接(CC)标准分为CC0、CC1、CC2 3组;在64-MSCTA影像上按照新的冠状动脉侧支分级方法 (MSCT-CC)评价,应用Kappa系数检验评估这两种分级标准的一致性.结果共有97例患者人组,其中37例CAG影像上发现至少1处CCC(共62支),33例64-MSCTA发现至少1处CCC(共47支).以CAG为金标准,64-MSCTA发现CCC患者的敏感性为89.2%(33/37),特异性为93.8%(60/64);发现CCC血管的敏感性为75.8%(47/62).将CAG和64-MSCTA均诊断的CCC按照Werner标准分组,其中CC0组4支、CC1组24支、CC2组19支;按照MSCT-CC标准分组,其中MSCT-CC0组7支、MSCT-CC1组22支、MSCT-CC2组18支.CAG和64-MSCTA对CCC的分级标准间存在较高的一致性(Kappa=0.857,P<0.01).结论64-MSCTA可以较准确地评估CCC. Objective To evaluate the ability of 64-slice spiral CT(64-MSCT) in demonstrating the coronary collateral circulation(CCC).Methods Patients undergoing 64- MSCT coronary angiography with relatively good image quality from August 2005 to April 2007 were entered into the study according to following requirements: patients underwent a traditional coronary artery angiography (CAG) after the coronary CT imaging; the CAG showed there was stenosis greater than 90% in at least one major coronary artery.The CCCs were assessed in CAG by the Rentrop grading, and the CAG served as the gold standard to determine the accuracy of 64-MSCT angiography in detecting collateral circulations.All CCCs were grouped angiographieally into three groups of CC0, CC1 ,and CC2 by Werner collateral collection(CC) grading.In the 64-MSCT coronary angiography imaging, a new grading(MSCT-CC) was used to evaluate CCCs.The consistency between these two grading standards was analyzed by Kappa test.Resalts A total of 97 patients were entered into the study, among whom at least one CCC was found by CAG in 37 patients and at least one CCC was detected by 64-MSCT angiography.Taken the CAG results as the reference standard, the sensitivity and specificity of the 64-MSCT angiography in detecting patients with the CCCs were 89.2% (33/37) and 93.8% (60/64) respectively.The sensitivity of the 64-MSCT angiography detecting the CCCs was 75.8% (47/62). All the CCCs detected by CAG and 64-MSCT angiography were grouped into three groups according to Werner grading: 4 in CC0 group, 24 in CC1 group and 19 in CC2 group.The CCCs were grouped into three groups according to MSCT-CC: 7 in MSCT-CC0 group, 22 in MSCT-CC1 group and 18 in MSCT-CC3 group.The consistency of the two grading criteria was relatively high (Kappa = 0.857, P < 0.01).Conclusion 64-MSCT angiography can accurately evaluate the coronary collateral circulation.
语种: 中文
原文出处: 查看原文
Citation statistics:
内容类型: 期刊论文
URI标识: http://ir.bjmu.edu.cn/handle/400002259/42192
Appears in Collections:北京大学第一临床医学院_放射治疗科_期刊论文

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: 北京大学第一医院放射科,100034
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[邱建星]'s Articles
[王继琛]'s Articles
[唐光健]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[邱建星]‘s Articles
[王继琛]‘s Articles
[唐光健]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

 

Valid XHTML 1.0!
Copyright © 2007-2017  北京大学医学部 - Feedback
Powered by CSpace