IR@PKUHSC  > 北京大学第一临床医学院  > 医学影像科
学科主题影像医学
MRI动态增强流出参数半定量分析对局部进展期乳腺癌新辅助化疗疗效评估的价值
其他题名Semiquantitative assessment of wash out parameter in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI for evaluating therapeutic effect of locally advanced breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
石桥; 王霄英; 郭丽; 秦乃姗; 蒋学祥
关键词乳腺肿瘤 抗肿瘤联合化疗方案 磁共振成像 病理学 Breast Neoplasms Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pathology
刊名中华放射学杂志
2013
DOI10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1201.2013.08.006
47期:8页:699-703
收录类别中国科技核心期刊 ; 中文核心期刊 ; CSCD
文章类型Journal Article
摘要目的 探讨MRI动态增强扫描时间-信号曲线(TIC)流出段斜率(Swash-out),对局部进展期乳腺癌新辅助化疗(NAC)疗效的评估效能.方法 回顾性分析59例术后病理确诊为浸润性导管癌患者的资料,所有患者均接受4个周期吡喃阿霉素+紫杉醇新辅助化疗.以改良病理反应性标准为金标准,分为组织学显著反应(MHR)与组织学非显著反应(NMHR)组.采用重复测量的方差检验分别对两组患者NAC不同周期后MRI动态增强扫描TIC曲线Swash-out进行比较,采用非参数检验Mann-Whitney法对两组NAC治疗不同周期后TIC曲线Swash-out进行比较.以病理反应性标准分组为金标准对NAC治疗2、4个周期后TIC曲线Swash-out进行ROC分析,分别计算曲线下面积(Az),评价其对NAC疗效的预测效能,并与常用TIC曲线半定量分析指标最大线性斜率(Smax)、增强峰值百分数(PPE)比较.结果 MHR组34例,NMHR组25例.NAC前MHR组Swash-out中位数为-16.99,NAC治疗2个周期后为5.66,NAC治疗4个周期后为15.95;NMHR组NAC前Swash-out中位数为-23.08(-64.24~ 34.39),NAC治疗2个周期后为-23.01(-52.72~28.70),NAC治疗4个周期后Swash-out为-11.45(-50.49 ~50.93).MHR组NAC治疗2个周期后及4个周期后Swash-out变化率分别为-1.18(-31.32 ~60.86)及1.50(-86.27 ~3.61),NMHR组NAC治疗2个周期后及4个周期后Swash-out变化率分别为-0.28(-3.24~9.46)及0.27(-5.34~3.11),NAC前MHR组Swash-out与NMHR组差异无统计学意义(Z=-0.97,P>0.05).NAC治疗2个周期后MHR组Swash-out及Swash-out变化率显著高于NMHR组(Z值分别为-3.97与-3.02,P<0.01).NAC治疗4个周期后MHR组Swash-out及Swash-out变化率显著高于NMHR组(Z值分别为-3.96与-3.16,P<0.01).以病理反应性分级为金标准,采用ROC评价Swash-out预测病理反应性的效能,NAC治疗2个周期和4个周期后Swash-out的曲线下面积分别为0.805和0.804,两者差异无统计学意义(Z =0.019,P>0.05),诊断最佳截断点分别为-8.670和4.105,诊断敏感度均为79.42%,特异度均为76.00%,约登指数均为0.554.结论 NAC前Swash-out不能预测病理反应性,NAC治疗2个周期、4个周期后Swash-out对NAC疗效具有较高的评估价值. Objective To study the value of the semiquantitative-parameter analysis of wash out index of time-intensity curve (Swash-out) in evaluating the therapeutic effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer (LABC).Methods Fifty-nine women with LABC underwent dynamic contrast enhancedt MRI examination before chemotherapy,after the 2nd cycle and the 4th cycle of chemotherapy.All patients were divided into major histological response group (MHR) and non-major histological response group (NMHR) according to the final pathologic response.Swash-out and the variancetrends of Swash-out before NAC,after the 2nd cycle of NAC and after the 4th cycle of NAC were compared in each group and between the two groups.According to the gold standard of Miller & Payne criterion,Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was performed to evaluate the predicting effect of Swash-out for NAC response,and to compare it with Semi-quantitative TIC curve indicators Smax (steepest slope) and PPE (peak percent enhancement).Results Fifty-nine patients of LABC patients were divided into a MHR group of 34 patients and a NMHR group of 25 patients.Swash before NAC of MHR group was-16.99 (-56.72-41.20),Swash-out after the 2nd cycle of NAC was 5.66(-69.45-53.08),Swash-out after 4th cycle of NAC was 15.95 (-7.80-54.23).Swash-out before NAC of NMHR group was-23.08 (-64.24-34.39),Swash-out after the 2nd cycle of NAC of NMHR group was-23.01 (-52.72-28.70),Swash-out after 4th cycle of NAC of NMHR group was-11.45 (-50.49-50.93).Swash-out variance rate of MHR group after the 2nd and the 4th cycle of NAC were-1.18 (-31.32-60.86) and 1.50 (-86.27-3.61),respectively.Swash-out variance rate of NMHR group after the 2nd and the 4th cycle of NAC were-0.28(-3.24-9.46) and 0.27 (-5.34-3.11),respectively.Swash-out was not significantly different between the two groups before NAC (Z =-0.97,P >0.05).Swash-out and Swash-out variance rate of MHR group after the 2nd cycle of NAC were significant higher than that of NMHR group (Z =-3.97 and-3.02,P <0.01).Swash-out and Swash-out variance rate of MHR group after the 4th cycle of NAC were significant higher than that of NMHR group (Z =-3.96 and-3.16,P < 0.01).Area under curve (Az) after the 2nd and the 4th cycle of NAC were 0.805 and 0.804,respectively,and no significant difference was found between them (Z =0.019,P >0.05).Diagnostic cut-off points were-8.670 for the 2nd cycle of NAC and 4.105 for the 4th cycle of NAC.Diagnostic sensitivity was 79.42%,specificity was 76.00% and Youden index was 0.554,for after the 2nd and the 4th cycle of NAC.Conclusion Swash-out of TIC curve before NAC cannot predict the response of NAC,Swash-out of TIC curve after the 2nd cycle of NAC and after the 4th cycle of NAC are efficient in predicting the response of NAC.
语种中文
原文出处查看原文
引用统计
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://ir.bjmu.edu.cn/handle/400002259/42733
专题北京大学第一临床医学院_医学影像科
作者单位100034,北京大学第一医院医学影像科北京大学前沿交叉学科研究院功能成像研究中心
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
石桥,王霄英,郭丽,等. MRI动态增强流出参数半定量分析对局部进展期乳腺癌新辅助化疗疗效评估的价值[J]. 中华放射学杂志,2013,47(8):699-703.
APA 石桥,王霄英,郭丽,秦乃姗,&蒋学祥.(2013).MRI动态增强流出参数半定量分析对局部进展期乳腺癌新辅助化疗疗效评估的价值.中华放射学杂志,47(8),699-703.
MLA 石桥,et al."MRI动态增强流出参数半定量分析对局部进展期乳腺癌新辅助化疗疗效评估的价值".中华放射学杂志 47.8(2013):699-703.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[石桥]的文章
[王霄英]的文章
[郭丽]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[石桥]的文章
[王霄英]的文章
[郭丽]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[石桥]的文章
[王霄英]的文章
[郭丽]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。