北京大学医学部机构知识库
Advanced  
IR@PKUHSC  > 北京大学第一临床医学院  > 检验科  > 期刊论文
学科主题: 临床检验诊断学
题名:
4种脂肪酶检测系统的性能评价
其他题名: Performance evaluation of four lipase detection systems
作者: 安崇文; 李海霞
关键词: 脂肪酶 ; 酶比色法 ; 全自动生化分析仪 ; Lipase ; Enzyme colorimetry ; Automatic biochemical analyzer
刊名: 中国实验诊断学
发表日期: 2015
期: 1, 页:1-6
收录类别: 中国科技核心期刊
文章类型: Journal Article
摘要: 目的:评估4种脂肪酶(Lipase,LPS)检测系统的分析性能。方法方法学评价研究。应用美国临床和实验室标准化协会(CLSI)EP5-A2、EP15-A2、EP7-A2、EP6-A、EP9-A2方法验证4种脂肪酶检测系统的精密度、正确度、抗干扰性、分析测量范围(AMR)、相关及偏差。采用美国病理学家协会(CAP)发放的室间质评物(C-A和 C-B)验证不同系统检测 LPS正确度。回归分析采用Passing-Bablok检验,回归线性检测采用Cusum方法,相关分析采用Pear-son检验,偏差分析应用Bland-Altman曲线。结果 LPS在25-240 U/L时,4种检测系统的批内CV均<TEa的1/4(9.47%),批间CV均<TEa的1/3(12.63%)。正确度验证测定美国CAP室间质评物显示仅 A、C系统较为理想,其95%验证区间包含了指定均值,且符合生物学变异设定的总允许误差(TEa:<37.88%);回收试验显示除 B系统高回收标本外,其它系统均未超出±10%。抗干扰性评估显示 Hb≥5g/L时,对B、C系统低水平有>10%的正干扰,在15 g/L时,对D系统低水平有>10%的正干扰;Bil≤600μmol/L时对4种系统均无明显干扰现象;TG≥8 mmol/L时,对A、C系统均有>10%的负干扰。4种系统 AMR上限分别为341、494、529、379 U/L。相关分析以选取上述性能较为理想的C系统为参考对象,A、B、D与C系统比较相关性较好,r均>0.975(P<0.01),Bland-Altman偏差分析显示平均绝对偏差分别为-9.7、-21.7、-21.1 U/L,平均相对偏差分别为-10.12%、-11.96%、-13.51%,计算医学决定水平(Xc)时的预期偏差显示在 Xc=60 U/L时,A、B、D系统均符合生物学变异设定的1/3总允许误差(12.63%),在Xc=180 U/L时,B、D系统的允许偏差不在预期偏差的可信区间内且小于可信区间下限,证实 B、D系统在 Xc=180 U/L时与C系统的性能不相当,结果可比性差,不可接受。结论4种检测系统的性能之间存在差异。 Objective To evaluate the performance for four Lipase(LPS)analysis system.Methods This study be-longs to the methodological evaluation study,Analysed four Lipase systems and their correlation and deviation compared with A system.Precision,accuracy,anti-interference,analytical measuring range (AMR)were evaluated,according to the CLSI EP5-A2,EP15-A2,EP7-A2,EP6-A,EP9-A2 guidelines.To assess the accuracy,we used the EQA samples(C-A and C-B)from CAP.Regression using Passing-Bablok,linear regression was detected by Cusum method,analysis of correlation using pearson,analysis of deviation using Bland-Altman.Results For four lipase detection systems,the within-run CVs were all <1/4TEa(9.47%)and the between-run CVs were all <1/3TEa(12.63%)when the concen-tration of LPS was 25-240 U/L.The accuracy verification testing CAP EQA material showed that A and C system re-sults met the desirable,the 9 5% verification interval that contains the specified mean value,and in accordance with the total allowable error derived from biological variation set (TEa:<37.88%);Recovery test shows that except for the high recovery of specimens from B system,other systems were not exceed± 10%.Anti-interference analysis showed that had over 10% positive interference on the low level of B、C system while Hb≥5 g/L and on the low level of D sys-tem when Hb was 15 g/L;There was no significant interference for the four systems when Bil≤600μmol/L.It had o-ver 10% negative interference of A、C system while TG≥8 mmol/L;The upper limits of AMR for A,B,C and D sys-tem were 341,494,529 and 379 U/L respectively.Correlation analysis to select the C system the performance of ideal as the reference object,the A,B,D system correlation well with C system and the pearson correlation coefficient(r)>0.975 (P< 0.01);Compared with C system,the Bland-Altman results showed that the average absolute deviation were-9.7、-21.7、-21.1 U/L and the average relative devation were-10.12%、-11.96%、-13.51% respectively for the A,B,D system.By calculating expected deviation of medical decision level (Xc)showed that A,B,D systems were in line with 1/3 total allowable error (12.63%)of the biological variation set when Xc=60 U/L,the allowable deviation of B,D systems were not in the confidence interval (CI)and also less than the lower limit of the confidence interval from ex-pected deviation when Xc=180 U/L,and performance of B,D system by verified was not quite compared with the C system when the Xc=180 U/L,comparability of the results was difference and unacceptable.Conclusion There are differences between the performance of the four lipase detection system.
语种: 中文
原文出处: 查看原文
内容类型: 期刊论文
URI标识: http://ir.bjmu.edu.cn/handle/400002259/43547
Appears in Collections:北京大学第一临床医学院_检验科_期刊论文

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: 北京大学第一医院 检验科,北京,100034

Recommended Citation:
安崇文,李海霞. 4种脂肪酶检测系统的性能评价[J]. 中国实验诊断学,2015(1):1-6.
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[安崇文]'s Articles
[李海霞]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[安崇文]‘s Articles
[李海霞]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

 

Valid XHTML 1.0!
Copyright © 2007-2017  北京大学医学部 - Feedback
Powered by CSpace