北京大学医学部机构知识库
Advanced  
IR@PKUHSC  > 北京大学第一临床医学院  > 检验科  > 期刊论文
学科主题: 临床检验诊断学
题名:
7种半胱氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂C检测系统的分析性能评价
其他题名: Performance evaluation of seven cystatin C analysis systems
作者: 安崇文; 李海霞
关键词: 半胱氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂C ; 颗粒增强免疫透射比浊检测系统 ; 颗粒增强免疫散射比浊检测系统 ; 均相溶胶颗粒免疫检测系统 ; Cystatin C ; Particle-enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay system ; Particle-enhanced nephelometric immunoassay system ; Sol particle immunoassay system
刊名: 检验医学
发表日期: 2013
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2013.12.011
期: 12, 页:1106-1111
收录类别: 中国科技核心期刊
文章类型: Journal Article
摘要: 目的:评估7种半胱氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂C(Cys C)检测系统的分析性能。方法应用美国临床实验室标准化协会(CLSI)系列文件评估5个颗粒增强免疫透射比浊(PETIA)检测系统和1个均相溶胶颗粒免疫法(SPIA)检测系统的精密度、正确度、空白限(LoB)、抗干扰性以及与SIEMENS BNⅡ颗粒增强免疫散射比浊(PE-NIA)检测系统(简称BNⅡ系统)的相关性和偏差。结果6个检测系统(以A~F表示)和BNⅡ系统在Cys C浓度为0.8~5.0 mg/L时的总批内变异系数(CV)均<3.75%,总批间CV除E系统外均<5%;正确度验证显示A~E系统和BNⅡ系统测定ERM-DA471的绝对偏倚分别为0.00、0.00、1.01、-0.01、-0.50和-0.35 mg/L,相对偏倚分别为0%、0%、18.43%、-0.18%、-9.12%和-6.39%;测定CAP室间质评物显示仅D系统和BNⅡ系统较为理想。A~F系统及BNⅡ系统的LoB分别为0.00、0.00、0.31、0.01、0.10、0.06和<0.05 mg/L。干扰分析显示Hb≤13 g/L、TG≤28 mmol/L时,对A、B系统及BNⅡ系统无明显影响(干扰<±10%),其他系统均有不同程度干扰。相关分析显示A~F系统与BNⅡ系统相关性较好[相关系数(r)均>0.975,P<0.01]。偏差分析显示,A~F系统与BNⅡ系统的平均偏差分别为-0.02、-0.10、-0.31、0.05、0.04、0.36 mg/L。结论 Cys C各检测系统测定有证参考物质ERM-DA471的最大偏倚可达到1 mg/L,最大相对偏倚为18.43%;其中PENIA在测定ERM-DA471和CAP室间质评物时结果低于PETIA;部分检测系统分析性能存在不足。 Objective To evaluate the analysis performance for 7 cystatin C (Cys C )analysis systems.Methods A total of 5 particle-enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay (PETIA)systems and 1 sol particle immunoassay (SPIA) system were evaluated according to the documents of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI),and their correlation with particle-enhanced nephelometric immunoassay (PENIA)system from the SIEMENS BNⅡ system (BNⅡ system),precision,accuracy,limit of blank (LoB)and anti-interference ability were evaluated.Results For 6 systems (A-F)and BNⅡsystem,the total within-run coefficients of variation (CV)were all<3.75%,and except E, the total between-run CV were all<5%,when Cys C concentration was 0.8-5.0 mg/L.For A-E and BNⅡ systems, accuracy verification showed that the absolute biases for measuring ERM-DA471 were 0.00,0.00,1.01,-0.01,-0.50 and -0.35 mg/L respectively,and the relative biases were 0%,0%,18.43%,-0.18%,-9.12% and -6.39%respectively.The measurement of CAP external quality assessment materials showed that D and BNⅡ systems had desirable results.The LoB were 0.00,0.00,0.31,0.01,0.10,0.06 and <0.05 mg/L for A-F and BNⅡ systems, respectively.When Hb≤13 g/L and TG ≤28 mmol/L,A,B and BNⅡ systems were not significantly influenced (interference<± 10% ).Other systems were influenced with different levels.The A-F systems correlated well with BNⅡ system,and the correlation coefficients (r)were all>0.975 (P<0.01 ).Compared with BN Ⅱ system,the average deviations were -0.02,-0.10,-0.31,0.05,0.04 and 0.36 mg/L for A-F systems,respectively. Conclusions The maximum bias can reach 1 mg/L when measuring the reference materials for Cys C analysis systems, and the maximum relative bias is 18.43%.The results of PENIA system are lower than those of PETIA system when measuring ERM-DA47 1 and CAP external quality assessment materials. In a part of analysis systems, analysis performance is not good.
语种: 中文
原文出处: 查看原文
Citation statistics:
内容类型: 期刊论文
URI标识: http://ir.bjmu.edu.cn/handle/400002259/43549
Appears in Collections:北京大学第一临床医学院_检验科_期刊论文

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: 北京大学第一医院检验科,北京,100034

Recommended Citation:
安崇文,李海霞. 7种半胱氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂C检测系统的分析性能评价[J]. 检验医学,2013(12):1106-1111.
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[安崇文]'s Articles
[李海霞]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[安崇文]‘s Articles
[李海霞]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

 

Valid XHTML 1.0!
Copyright © 2007-2017  北京大学医学部 - Feedback
Powered by CSpace