IR@PKUHSC  > 北京大学第三临床医学院  > 骨科
学科主题临床医学
Double pedicle screw instrumentation in the osteoporotic spine - A biomechanical feasibility study
Steffen, Thomas1; Jiang, Liang1; Arlet, Vincent1; Beckman, Lorne1
关键词Biomechanics Osteoporosis Pedicle Screw Fixation Strength Surgical Technique
刊名JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES
2007-08-01
20期:6页:430-435
收录类别SCI
文章类型Article
WOS标题词Science & Technology
类目[WOS]Clinical Neurology ; Orthopedics
研究领域[WOS]Neurosciences & Neurology ; Orthopedics
关键词[WOS]BONE-MINERAL DENSITY ; COMPRESSION FRACTURES ; IN-VITRO ; FIXATION ; HOOK
英文摘要

Study Design: A biomechanical feasibility test.

Objective: To assess the overall feasibility, safety, and mechanical effectiveness of an intrapedicular double-screw construct in the thoracolumbar spine.

Summary of Background Data: The bony purchase of the pedicle screw fixation is often not strong enough in elderly patients with osteoporosis. Our hypothesis was that the elliptical cross-section of the pedicle would allow the insertion of 2 smaller diameter pedicle screws resulting in a bony purchase superior to the standard single-screw technique.

Methods: Thirty-six double-screw constructs (5 turn diameter AOUSS and 5 mm Schanz screw) and 36 standard single pedicle screws (6 mm diameter AOUSS screw) were placed. Screw pullout, multiaxial flexibility, and axial failure load testing was performed.

Results: Visual inspection, palpation, and radiograph confirmed that there were no pedicle breaches. In the double-screw group, all but 2 constructs had ideal direction. Pullout strength of the double-screw construct was no different than that of the single-screw construct. However, stiffness increased considerably in all testing modes. Axial load to failure, adjusted for bone mineral density, and dimensional variation, also increased. All differences were statistically significant except for axial rotation that was only marginally significant.

Conclusions: The double-screw construct appears feasible and safe in the thoracolumbar spine. In this study, the new technique demonstrates a mechanical advantage over the standard single-screw technique. Further in vitro cadaveric safety studies with better adapted instrumentation are needed before the technique can be widely recommended.

语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000248691700004
引用统计
被引频次:15[WOS]   [WOS记录]     [WOS相关记录]
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://ir.bjmu.edu.cn/handle/400002259/50351
专题北京大学第三临床医学院_骨科
作者单位1.Peking Univ, Hosp 3, Dept Orthopaed, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
2.Univ Virginia, Div Spine Surg, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
3.McGill Univ, Div Orthopaed Surg, Orthopaed Res Lab, Montreal, PQ, Canada
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Steffen, Thomas,Jiang, Liang,Arlet, Vincent,et al. Double pedicle screw instrumentation in the osteoporotic spine - A biomechanical feasibility study[J]. JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES,2007,20(6):430-435.
APA Steffen, Thomas,Jiang, Liang,Arlet, Vincent,&Beckman, Lorne.(2007).Double pedicle screw instrumentation in the osteoporotic spine - A biomechanical feasibility study.JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES,20(6),430-435.
MLA Steffen, Thomas,et al."Double pedicle screw instrumentation in the osteoporotic spine - A biomechanical feasibility study".JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES 20.6(2007):430-435.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Steffen, Thomas]的文章
[Jiang, Liang]的文章
[Arlet, Vincent]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Steffen, Thomas]的文章
[Jiang, Liang]的文章
[Arlet, Vincent]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Steffen, Thomas]的文章
[Jiang, Liang]的文章
[Arlet, Vincent]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。