IR@PKUHSC  > 北京大学口腔医学院  > 口腔预防保健科
学科主题口腔医学
Sealant retention is better assessed through colour photographs than through the replica and the visual examination methods
Hu, Xuan1; Fan, Mingwan1; Rong, Wensheng2; Lo, Edward C. M.3; Bronkhorst, Ewald4; Frencken, Jo E.5
关键词Clinical Examination Dental Photography Method Validation Scanning Electron Microscopy Sealant Retention
刊名EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES
2014-08-01
DOI10.1111/eos.12138
122期:4页:279-285
收录类别SCI
文章类型Article
WOS标题词Science & Technology
类目[WOS]Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
研究领域[WOS]Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
关键词[WOS]RESIN-BASED SEALANT ; GLASS-IONOMER ; FISSURE SEALANTS ; CARIES
英文摘要

The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that the colour photograph method has a higher level of validity for assessing sealant retention than the visual clinical examination and replica methods. Sealed molars were assessed by two evaluators. The scores for the three methods were compared against consensus scores derived through assessing retention from scanning electron microscopy images (reference standard). The presence/absence (survival) of retained sealants on occlusal surfaces was determined according to the traditional and modified categorizations of retention. Sensitivity, specificity, and Youden-index scores were calculated. Sealant retention assessment scores for visual clinical examinations and for colour photographs were compared with those of the reference standard on 95 surfaces, and sealant retention assessment scores for replicas were compared with those of the reference standard on 33 surfaces. The highest mean Youden-index score for the presence/absence of sealant material was observed for the colour photograph method, followed by that for the replica method; the visual clinical examination method scored lowest. The mean Youden-index score for the survival of retained sealants was highest for the colour photograph method for both the traditional (0.882) and the modified (0.768) categories of sealant retention, whilst the visual clinical examination method had the lowest Youden-index score for these categories (0.745 and 0.063, respectively). The colour photograph method had a higher validity than the replica and the visual examination methods for assessing sealant retention.

语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000339657800005
项目编号2007BA128B00 ; 08CDP011 ; R0000463
资助机构Ministry of Science and Technology, China ; Netherlands Academy of Science ; Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands
引用统计
被引频次:6[WOS]   [WOS记录]     [WOS相关记录]
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://ir.bjmu.edu.cn/handle/400002259/51549
专题北京大学口腔医学院_口腔预防保健科
作者单位1.Wuhan Univ, Key Lab Oral Biomed Engn, Minist Educ, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
2.Peking Univ, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Dept Prevent Dent, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
3.Univ Hong Kong, Fac Dent, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
4.Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Coll Dent Sci, Dept Prevent & Restorat Dent, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
5.Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Coll Dent Sci, Dept Global Oral Hlth, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Hu, Xuan,Fan, Mingwan,Rong, Wensheng,et al. Sealant retention is better assessed through colour photographs than through the replica and the visual examination methods[J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES,2014,122(4):279-285.
APA Hu, Xuan,Fan, Mingwan,Rong, Wensheng,Lo, Edward C. M.,Bronkhorst, Ewald,&Frencken, Jo E..(2014).Sealant retention is better assessed through colour photographs than through the replica and the visual examination methods.EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES,122(4),279-285.
MLA Hu, Xuan,et al."Sealant retention is better assessed through colour photographs than through the replica and the visual examination methods".EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES 122.4(2014):279-285.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Hu, Xuan]的文章
[Fan, Mingwan]的文章
[Rong, Wensheng]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Hu, Xuan]的文章
[Fan, Mingwan]的文章
[Rong, Wensheng]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Hu, Xuan]的文章
[Fan, Mingwan]的文章
[Rong, Wensheng]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。