北京大学医学部机构知识库
Advanced  
IR@PKUHSC  > 北京大学口腔医学院  > 口腔预防保健科  > 期刊论文
学科主题: 口腔医学
题名:
Sealant retention is better assessed through colour photographs than through the replica and the visual examination methods
作者: Hu, Xuan1; Fan, Mingwan1; Rong, Wensheng2; Lo, Edward C. M.3; Bronkhorst, Ewald4; Frencken, Jo E.5
关键词: clinical examination ; dental photography ; method validation ; scanning electron microscopy ; sealant retention
刊名: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES
发表日期: 2014-08-01
DOI: 10.1111/eos.12138
卷: 122, 期:4, 页:279-285
收录类别: SCI
文章类型: Article
WOS标题词: Science & Technology
类目[WOS]: Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
研究领域[WOS]: Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
关键词[WOS]: RESIN-BASED SEALANT ; GLASS-IONOMER ; FISSURE SEALANTS ; CARIES
英文摘要:

The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that the colour photograph method has a higher level of validity for assessing sealant retention than the visual clinical examination and replica methods. Sealed molars were assessed by two evaluators. The scores for the three methods were compared against consensus scores derived through assessing retention from scanning electron microscopy images (reference standard). The presence/absence (survival) of retained sealants on occlusal surfaces was determined according to the traditional and modified categorizations of retention. Sensitivity, specificity, and Youden-index scores were calculated. Sealant retention assessment scores for visual clinical examinations and for colour photographs were compared with those of the reference standard on 95 surfaces, and sealant retention assessment scores for replicas were compared with those of the reference standard on 33 surfaces. The highest mean Youden-index score for the presence/absence of sealant material was observed for the colour photograph method, followed by that for the replica method; the visual clinical examination method scored lowest. The mean Youden-index score for the survival of retained sealants was highest for the colour photograph method for both the traditional (0.882) and the modified (0.768) categories of sealant retention, whilst the visual clinical examination method had the lowest Youden-index score for these categories (0.745 and 0.063, respectively). The colour photograph method had a higher validity than the replica and the visual examination methods for assessing sealant retention.

语种: 英语
所属项目编号: 2007BA128B00 ; 08CDP011 ; R0000463
项目资助者: Ministry of Science and Technology, China ; Netherlands Academy of Science ; Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands
WOS记录号: WOS:000339657800005
Citation statistics:
内容类型: 期刊论文
URI标识: http://ir.bjmu.edu.cn/handle/400002259/51549
Appears in Collections:北京大学口腔医学院_口腔预防保健科_期刊论文

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: 1.Wuhan Univ, Key Lab Oral Biomed Engn, Minist Educ, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
2.Peking Univ, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Dept Prevent Dent, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
3.Univ Hong Kong, Fac Dent, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
4.Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Coll Dent Sci, Dept Prevent & Restorat Dent, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
5.Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Coll Dent Sci, Dept Global Oral Hlth, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands

Recommended Citation:
Hu, Xuan,Fan, Mingwan,Rong, Wensheng,et al. Sealant retention is better assessed through colour photographs than through the replica and the visual examination methods[J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES,2014,122(4):279-285.
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Hu, Xuan]'s Articles
[Fan, Mingwan]'s Articles
[Rong, Wensheng]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Hu, Xuan]‘s Articles
[Fan, Mingwan]‘s Articles
[Rong, Wensheng]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 
评注功能仅针对注册用户开放,请您登录
您对该条目有什么异议,请填写以下表单,管理员会尽快联系您。
内 容:
Email:  *
单位:
验证码:   刷新
您在IR的使用过程中有什么好的想法或者建议可以反馈给我们。
标 题:
 *
内 容:
Email:  *
验证码:   刷新

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

 

Valid XHTML 1.0!
Copyright © 2007-2017  北京大学医学部 - Feedback
Powered by CSpace