IR@PKUHSC  > 北京大学第三临床医学院
学科主题临床医学
Therapeutic Effect of Esophageal Foreign Body Extraction Management: Flexible versus Rigid Endoscopy in 216 Adults of Beijing
Yan, Xiu-e; Zhou, Li-ya; Lin, San-ren; Wang, Ye; Wang, Ying-chun
关键词Esophagus Foreign Body Flexible Endoscopy Rigid Endoscopy Adult
刊名MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR
2014-10-27
20页:2054-2060
收录类别SCI
文章类型Article
WOS标题词Science & Technology
类目[WOS]Medicine, Research & Experimental
研究领域[WOS]Research & Experimental Medicine
关键词[WOS]GASTROINTESTINAL-TRACT ; BODIES ; CHILDREN ; REMOVAL ; COMPLICATIONS ; INGESTION
英文摘要

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and complications of rigid endoscopy (RE) and flexible endoscopy (FE) for the extraction of esophageal foreign bodies (FB) in adults.

Material/Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the medical records of 216 adult patients with esophageal FB impaction treated at Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China, between January 2008 and December 2012.

Results: The success rate of FB extraction was 100% (142/142) in patients treated with RE compared to 97.3% (72/74) in those treated with FE (P=0.045). The total incidence of complications in RE-treated patients was lower than that in FE-treated patients (28.2% vs. 45.9%, P=0.009), but the perforation rate was higher (5.6% vs. 1.4%, P=0.135). The incidences of total complications and perforation were associated with the duration of FB impaction in patients who underwent RE (both P<0.05) but not in patients who underwent FE. RE was more frequently used in extraction of FBs located in the upper esophagus (88.7%, 126/142) compared to FE (60.8%, 45/74) (P<0.05). The size of extracted FB was significantly larger in patients treated with FE compared to those treated with RE (P<0.05).

Conclusions: Both RE and FE were effective in the extraction of esophageal FB. However, the perforation rate and the need for general anesthesia were higher in RE-associated extraction. FE may be the preferred endoscopic treatment for the extraction of esophageal FB, except possibly for those impacted in the upper esophagus. FB extraction may produce better outcomes if endoscopy is employed early.

语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000346197200001
项目编号81100261
资助机构National Natural Science Foundation for Young Scholars
引用统计
被引频次:4[WOS]   [WOS记录]     [WOS相关记录]
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://ir.bjmu.edu.cn/handle/400002259/55755
专题北京大学第三临床医学院
北京大学第三临床医学院_肾内科
北京大学第三临床医学院_消化科
作者单位Peking Univ, Hosp 3, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Yan, Xiu-e,Zhou, Li-ya,Lin, San-ren,et al. Therapeutic Effect of Esophageal Foreign Body Extraction Management: Flexible versus Rigid Endoscopy in 216 Adults of Beijing[J]. MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR,2014,20:2054-2060.
APA Yan, Xiu-e,Zhou, Li-ya,Lin, San-ren,Wang, Ye,&Wang, Ying-chun.(2014).Therapeutic Effect of Esophageal Foreign Body Extraction Management: Flexible versus Rigid Endoscopy in 216 Adults of Beijing.MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR,20,2054-2060.
MLA Yan, Xiu-e,et al."Therapeutic Effect of Esophageal Foreign Body Extraction Management: Flexible versus Rigid Endoscopy in 216 Adults of Beijing".MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR 20(2014):2054-2060.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Yan, Xiu-e]的文章
[Zhou, Li-ya]的文章
[Lin, San-ren]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Yan, Xiu-e]的文章
[Zhou, Li-ya]的文章
[Lin, San-ren]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Yan, Xiu-e]的文章
[Zhou, Li-ya]的文章
[Lin, San-ren]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。