IR@PKUHSC  > 北京大学公共卫生学院
学科主题公共卫生
Comparison of growth and nutritional status in infants receiving goat milk-based formula and cow milk-based formula: a randomized, double-blind study
Xu, Meihong1,2; Wang, Yibin1,2; Dai, Zhiyong3; Zhang, Yanchun3; Li, Yong1,2; Wang, Junbo1,2
关键词Infant Formula Goat Milk Growth Nutritional Status
刊名FOOD & NUTRITION RESEARCH
2015
DOI10.3402/fnr.v59.28613
59
收录类别SCI
文章类型Article
WOS标题词Science & Technology
类目[WOS]Food Science & Technology ; Nutrition & Dietetics
研究领域[WOS]Food Science & Technology ; Nutrition & Dietetics
关键词[WOS]BREAST-MILK ; RATS ; OLIGOSACCHARIDES ; BIOAVAILABILITY ; ANEMIA ; COPPER ; IRON
英文摘要

Objective: To compare the growth and nutritional status of infants fed goat milk-based formula (GMF) and cow milk-based formula (CMF).

Methods: The study was conducted in Beijing, China. It was a double-blind randomized controlled trial. A total of 79 infants aged 0-3 months old were recruited and randomized in GMF or CMF group. The infants were fed the allocated formula to 6 months. The weight, length, and head circumference were measured at the enrolment, 3 and 6 months. The start time and types of solid food were recorded. Blood elements, urinal, and fecal parameters were also tested.

Results: The average weight of infants in the GMF group (mean +/- SD) was 4.67 +/- 0.99 kg and in the CMF group 4.73 +/- 1.10 kg at enrolment, and 8.75 +/- 0.98 kg (GMF) and 8.92 +/- 0.88 kg (CMF) at 6 months. There were no differences in the adjusted intention-to-treat analyses of weight, length, head circumference, and BMI z-scores between the two formula-fed groups over the 6-month study. Similarly, there were no remarkable differences in the timing and types of solid food, blood elements, urinal, and feces parameters, between the GMF and CMF group. No group differences have been shown in bowel motion consistency, duration of crying, ease of settling, or frequency of adverse events.

Conclusions: GMF-provided growth and nutritional outcomes did not differ from those provided by CMF.

语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000366519500001
引用统计
被引频次:1[WOS]   [WOS记录]     [WOS相关记录]
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://ir.bjmu.edu.cn/handle/400002259/56520
专题北京大学公共卫生学院
北京大学公共卫生学院_公共卫生学院
作者单位1.Peking Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Nutr & Food Hyg, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
2.Peking Univ, Beijing Key Lab Toxicol Res & Risk Assessment Foo, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
3.Ausnutria Hyproca Dairy Grp BV, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Xu, Meihong,Wang, Yibin,Dai, Zhiyong,et al. Comparison of growth and nutritional status in infants receiving goat milk-based formula and cow milk-based formula: a randomized, double-blind study[J]. FOOD & NUTRITION RESEARCH,2015,59.
APA Xu, Meihong,Wang, Yibin,Dai, Zhiyong,Zhang, Yanchun,Li, Yong,&Wang, Junbo.(2015).Comparison of growth and nutritional status in infants receiving goat milk-based formula and cow milk-based formula: a randomized, double-blind study.FOOD & NUTRITION RESEARCH,59.
MLA Xu, Meihong,et al."Comparison of growth and nutritional status in infants receiving goat milk-based formula and cow milk-based formula: a randomized, double-blind study".FOOD & NUTRITION RESEARCH 59(2015).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Xu, Meihong]的文章
[Wang, Yibin]的文章
[Dai, Zhiyong]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Xu, Meihong]的文章
[Wang, Yibin]的文章
[Dai, Zhiyong]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Xu, Meihong]的文章
[Wang, Yibin]的文章
[Dai, Zhiyong]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。