IR@PKUHSC  > 北京大学口腔医学院
学科主题口腔医学
Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: One-year results
Yip, HK; Smales, RJ; Yu, C; Gao, XJ; Deng, DM
关键词Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Cavity Preparation Glass-ionomer Cement Restoration
刊名QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL
2002
33期:1页:17-21
收录类别SCI
文章类型Article
WOS标题词Science & Technology
类目[WOS]Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
研究领域[WOS]Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
关键词[WOS]TREATMENT ART
英文摘要

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the success rates of glass-ionomer cement restorations placed with the atraumatic restorative treatment approach and conventional cavity preparation methods. Method and materials: Two encapsulated, high-strength, esthetic conventional glass-ionomer cements were placed in 82 Class I and 53 Class II atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations, and an encapsulated amalgam alloy was placed in 32 Class I conventional preparations, in vital primary molars of 60 Chinese children aged 7 to 9 years. Results: The atraumatic restorative treatment preparations, made with hand instruments only, took approximately 50% longer to complete than did the preparations completed with conventional rotary instrumentation. After 1 year, there were no amalgam failures. For the glass-ionomer cement restorations, when the atraumatic restorative treatment method was used, significantly better survival rates were found for Class I (92.9%) than for Class II (64.7%) cavity preparations. There was also a strong trend for relatively better survival rates for the conventional cavity preparation method (86.7%) than for the atraumatic restorative treatment (64.7%) method for Class II cavity preparations, However, both the atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional methods appeared equally effective for Class I preparations. Conclusion: In a clinic setting, the use of atraumatic restorative treatment hand instruments for cavity preparation is more time consuming, and the method may also provide less mechanical retention and/or bulk of glass-ionomer cement for some Class II preparations in primary molars than does the use of conventional rotary instruments.

语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000173377600004
引用统计
被引频次:37[WOS]   [WOS记录]     [WOS相关记录]
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://ir.bjmu.edu.cn/handle/400002259/57001
专题北京大学口腔医学院
作者单位1.Prince Philip Dent Hosp, Oral Diag Fac, Dept Oral Diag, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
2.Univ British Columbia, Fac Dent, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
3.Univ Hong Kong, Fac Dent, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
4.Beijing Med Univ, Sch Stomatol, Dept Operat Dent & Endodontol, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Yip, HK,Smales, RJ,Yu, C,et al. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: One-year results[J]. QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL,2002,33(1):17-21.
APA Yip, HK,Smales, RJ,Yu, C,Gao, XJ,&Deng, DM.(2002).Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: One-year results.QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL,33(1),17-21.
MLA Yip, HK,et al."Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: One-year results".QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL 33.1(2002):17-21.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Yip, HK]的文章
[Smales, RJ]的文章
[Yu, C]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Yip, HK]的文章
[Smales, RJ]的文章
[Yu, C]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Yip, HK]的文章
[Smales, RJ]的文章
[Yu, C]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。