北京大学医学部机构知识库
Advanced  
IR@PKUHSC  > 北京大学口腔医学院  > 期刊论文
学科主题: 口腔医学
题名:
Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: One-year results
作者: Yip, HK; Smales, RJ; Yu, C; Gao, XJ; Deng, DM
关键词: atraumatic restorative treatment ; cavity preparation ; glass-ionomer cement ; restoration
刊名: QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL
发表日期: 2002
卷: 33, 期:1, 页:17-21
收录类别: SCI
文章类型: Article
WOS标题词: Science & Technology
类目[WOS]: Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
研究领域[WOS]: Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
关键词[WOS]: TREATMENT ART
英文摘要:

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the success rates of glass-ionomer cement restorations placed with the atraumatic restorative treatment approach and conventional cavity preparation methods. Method and materials: Two encapsulated, high-strength, esthetic conventional glass-ionomer cements were placed in 82 Class I and 53 Class II atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations, and an encapsulated amalgam alloy was placed in 32 Class I conventional preparations, in vital primary molars of 60 Chinese children aged 7 to 9 years. Results: The atraumatic restorative treatment preparations, made with hand instruments only, took approximately 50% longer to complete than did the preparations completed with conventional rotary instrumentation. After 1 year, there were no amalgam failures. For the glass-ionomer cement restorations, when the atraumatic restorative treatment method was used, significantly better survival rates were found for Class I (92.9%) than for Class II (64.7%) cavity preparations. There was also a strong trend for relatively better survival rates for the conventional cavity preparation method (86.7%) than for the atraumatic restorative treatment (64.7%) method for Class II cavity preparations, However, both the atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional methods appeared equally effective for Class I preparations. Conclusion: In a clinic setting, the use of atraumatic restorative treatment hand instruments for cavity preparation is more time consuming, and the method may also provide less mechanical retention and/or bulk of glass-ionomer cement for some Class II preparations in primary molars than does the use of conventional rotary instruments.

语种: 英语
WOS记录号: WOS:000173377600004
Citation statistics:
内容类型: 期刊论文
URI标识: http://ir.bjmu.edu.cn/handle/400002259/57001
Appears in Collections:北京大学口腔医学院_期刊论文

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: 1.Prince Philip Dent Hosp, Oral Diag Fac, Dept Oral Diag, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
2.Univ British Columbia, Fac Dent, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
3.Univ Hong Kong, Fac Dent, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
4.Beijing Med Univ, Sch Stomatol, Dept Operat Dent & Endodontol, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China

Recommended Citation:
Yip, HK,Smales, RJ,Yu, C,et al. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: One-year results[J]. QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL,2002,33(1):17-21.
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Yip, HK]'s Articles
[Smales, RJ]'s Articles
[Yu, C]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Yip, HK]‘s Articles
[Smales, RJ]‘s Articles
[Yu, C]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 
评注功能仅针对注册用户开放,请您登录
您对该条目有什么异议,请填写以下表单,管理员会尽快联系您。
内 容:
Email:  *
单位:
验证码:   刷新
您在IR的使用过程中有什么好的想法或者建议可以反馈给我们。
标 题:
 *
内 容:
Email:  *
验证码:   刷新

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

 

Valid XHTML 1.0!
Copyright © 2007-2017  北京大学医学部 - Feedback
Powered by CSpace