北京大学医学部机构知识库
Advanced  
IR@PKUHSC  > 北京大学公共卫生学院  > 期刊论文
学科主题: 公共卫生
题名:
The quality of clinical practice guidelines in China: a systematic assessment
作者: Hu, Jing1,2; Chen, Ru1,2; Wu, Shanshan1; Tang, Jinling3; Leng, Gillian4; Kunnamo, Ilkka5; Yang, Zhirong1,2; Wang, Weiwei1,2; Hua, Xinyang1,2; Zhang, Yuelun1,2; Xie, Yanming6; Zhan, Siyan1,2
关键词: AGREE instrument ; China ; clinical practice guidelines ; evidence-based guidelines ; quality assessment ; recommendation
刊名: JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
发表日期: 2013-10-01
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01893.x
卷: 19, 期:5, 页:961-967
收录类别: SCI ; SSCI
文章类型: Article
WOS标题词: Science & Technology
类目[WOS]: Health Care Sciences & Services ; Medical Informatics ; Medicine, General & Internal
研究领域[WOS]: Health Care Sciences & Services ; Medical Informatics ; General & Internal Medicine
关键词[WOS]: MEDICAL LITERATURE ; RECOMMENDATIONS ; APPRAISAL ; CONFLICT ; VALIDITY ; TRIALS
英文摘要:

BackgroundClinical guidelines are an important tool for improving service quality, the benefits of guidelines depend on their quality. In China, there has been a great increase in production of guidelines. However, little is known about their quality.

MethodWe identified Chinese guidelines published between 2006 and 2010 by searching three Chinese full-text databases, major Chinese guidelines websites and Google. Three appraisers independently evaluated each guideline by using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument. Subgroup analyses were performed according to source, title, version, aspect of care and developer of guidelines.

ResultsA total of 327 guidelines were eligible and 57 were excluded for their lacking of any account of the guideline development methodology. Of the 270 guidelines, 77 (28.5%) can be recommended, 6 (2.2%) were evidence-based guidelines. Sixteen (5.9%) guidelines described the methods used to search for evidence, 61 (22.6%) appraised the quality of evidence and 53 (19.6%) graded the strength of recommendations. Two guidelines declared the involvement of methodological experts and none reported considering patients′ values. 29 (10.7%) guidelines received drug company sponsorship but only two declared the views of the funding bodies did not influence the recommendations, 259 (95.9%) didn′t declare the interest conflicts of guideline developers. Guidelines downloaded from Internet and with updated versions yielded higher quality than the rest.

ConclusionsAlthough numerous guidelines were produced in China, the quality was generally low. Focusing on improving the quality of Chinese guidelines, rather than continuing to produce them in great quantity, is urgently needed.

语种: 英语
WOS记录号: WOS:000329285500035
Citation statistics:
内容类型: 期刊论文
URI标识: http://ir.bjmu.edu.cn/handle/400002259/59646
Appears in Collections:北京大学公共卫生学院_期刊论文

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: 1.Peking Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Sch Publ Hlth, Hlth Sci Ctr, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
2.Natl Inst Hlth & Clin Excellence, London, England
3.Finnish Med Soc Duodecim, Helsinki, Finland
4.Peking Univ, Evidence Based Med Ctr, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
5.Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Hong Kong Cochrane Ctr, Sch Publ Hlth, Fac Med, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
6.China Acad Chinese Med Sci, Inst Basic Res Clin Med, Beijing, Peoples R China

Recommended Citation:
Hu, Jing,Chen, Ru,Wu, Shanshan,et al. The quality of clinical practice guidelines in China: a systematic assessment[J]. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE,2013,19(5):961-967.
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Hu, Jing]'s Articles
[Chen, Ru]'s Articles
[Wu, Shanshan]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Hu, Jing]‘s Articles
[Chen, Ru]‘s Articles
[Wu, Shanshan]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

 

Valid XHTML 1.0!
Copyright © 2007-2017  北京大学医学部 - Feedback
Powered by CSpace