IR@PKUHSC  > 北京大学第三临床医学院
学科主题临床医学
Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS) Versus Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-rotation (PFNA) in Treating Proximal Femoral Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Study
Zhou, Fang; Zhang, Zhi Shan; Yang, Huan; Tian, Yun; Ji, Hong Quan; Guo, Yan; Lv, Yang
关键词proximal femoral fractures LISS PFNA minimally invasive surgery
刊名JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA
2012-03-01
DOI10.1097/BOT.0b013e318225f793
26期:3页:155-162
收录类别SCI
文章类型Article
WOS标题词Science & Technology
类目[WOS]Orthopedics ; Sport Sciences
研究领域[WOS]Orthopedics ; Sport Sciences
关键词[WOS]DYNAMIC CONDYLAR SCREW ; DISTAL FEMUR FRACTURES ; GAMMA-NAIL ; HIP SCREW ; SUBTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES ; BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION ; TROCHANTERIC FRACTURES ; INTERNAL-FIXATION ; COMPLICATIONS ; OSTEOPOROSIS
英文摘要

Objective: To evaluate the outcome and efficacy of LISS (Less Invasive Stabilization System; Synthes USA, Paoli, PA) for the treatment of proximal femoral fractures to find another appropriate minimally invasive surgery for these fractures in which intramedullary nailing may be difficult.

Design: A consecutive prospective randomized clinical study.

Setting: University teaching hospital.

Patients: Between May 2006 and March 2008, 64 consecutive patients who had a proximal femoral fracture were randomized to be treated with fixation with either LISS or PFNA (Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-rotation; Synthes USA).

Intervention: LISS or PFNA fixation of proximal femoral fractures.

Main Outcome Measurements: Intraoperative time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospitalization, hip function (Harris score), general complications, fracture complications.

Results: Fifty-nine patients were evaluated with a mean follow-up time of 26.8 months (range, 21-36 months). No statistical differences in general complications, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospitalization, or hip function could be found between the two groups. The average operative time was longer in the LISS group (98.25 minutes) compared with the PFNA group (65.36 minutes) (P < 0.05). One PFNA case had intrapelvic penetration of the helical blade; two LISS cases had breakage of the screws.

Conclusion: There were no major differences in outcome or complications between the treatment groups. LISS can be used effectively in treating proximal femoral fractures, especially for complex fractures patterns in which intramedullary nailing may be difficult.

语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000300605400008
引用统计
被引频次:21[WOS]   [WOS记录]     [WOS相关记录]
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://ir.bjmu.edu.cn/handle/400002259/60527
专题北京大学第三临床医学院
作者单位Peking Univ, Hosp 3, Orthoped Trauma Serv, Trauma Div,Orthoped Dept, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Zhou, Fang,Zhang, Zhi Shan,Yang, Huan,et al. Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS) Versus Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-rotation (PFNA) in Treating Proximal Femoral Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Study[J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA,2012,26(3):155-162.
APA Zhou, Fang.,Zhang, Zhi Shan.,Yang, Huan.,Tian, Yun.,Ji, Hong Quan.,...&Lv, Yang.(2012).Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS) Versus Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-rotation (PFNA) in Treating Proximal Femoral Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Study.JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA,26(3),155-162.
MLA Zhou, Fang,et al."Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS) Versus Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-rotation (PFNA) in Treating Proximal Femoral Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Study".JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA 26.3(2012):155-162.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Zhou, Fang]的文章
[Zhang, Zhi Shan]的文章
[Yang, Huan]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Zhou, Fang]的文章
[Zhang, Zhi Shan]的文章
[Yang, Huan]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Zhou, Fang]的文章
[Zhang, Zhi Shan]的文章
[Yang, Huan]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。