IR@PKUHSC  > 北京大学基础医学院  > 病原生物学系
学科主题基础医学
A meta-analysis of the long-term effects of chronic pancreatitis surgical treatments: duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy
Lu Wen-ping1; Shi Qing2; Zhang Wen-zhi1; Cai Shou-wang1; Jiang Kai1; Dong Jia-hong1
关键词chronic pancreatitis surgical treatments long-term postoperative effect meta-analysis
刊名CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL
2013-01-05
DOI10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20112607
126期:1页:147-153
收录类别SCI
文章类型Article
WOS标题词Science & Technology
类目[WOS]Medicine, General & Internal
研究领域[WOS]General & Internal Medicine
关键词[WOS]WHIPPLE PROCEDURE ; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL ; FOLLOW-UP ; BEGER ; PRESERVATION ; EXPERIENCE ; DRAINAGE ; FREY
英文摘要

Background Surgery is regarded as the most effective treatment to relieve pain and reduce complications in chronic pancreatitis (CP). Two major strategies exist: duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR) and pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Many studies suggest that DPPHR offers advantages during surgery and in the short-term; however, the long-term effects have not been thoroughly investigated. We analyzed the long-term outcomes of DPPHR and PD, over follow-up times of at least 1 year, to determine the optimal surgical treatment for CP.

Methods We systemically reviewed all CP surgical treatment reports, and only included randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing DPPHR and PD, excluding unqualified studies using several pre-specified criteria. When multiple publications of a single trial were found, the most comprehensive current data were selected. Characteristics of the study populations and long-term postoperative outcome parameters were collected. The quality of the studies and data was analyzed using RevMan 4.2 software.

Results Five trials were qualified for meta-analysis, with 261 participants in total (114 in the DPPHR group and 147 in the PD group). There were no significant differences in the age, gender, or indications for surgery of each group. At the mean of 5.7-year (1-14 years) follow-up examination, DPPHR and PD resulted in equally effective pain relief, exocrine and endocrine function, and similar mortality rates (P > 0.05); however, DPPHR patients had improved global quality of life and weight gain, and reduced diarrhea and fatigue (P < 0.05).

Conclusion DPPHR and PD result in equal pain relief, mortality, and pancreatic function; however, DPPHR provides superior long-term outcomes.

语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000319793700027
引用统计
被引频次:15[WOS]   [WOS记录]     [WOS相关记录]
文献类型期刊论文
版本出版稿
条目标识符http://ir.bjmu.edu.cn/handle/400002259/62364
专题北京大学基础医学院_病原生物学系
作者单位1.Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Dept Hepatobiliary Surg, Beijing 100853, Peoples R China
2.Peking Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Microbiol, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Lu Wen-ping,Shi Qing,Zhang Wen-zhi,et al. A meta-analysis of the long-term effects of chronic pancreatitis surgical treatments: duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy[J]. CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL,2013,126(1):147-153.
APA Lu Wen-ping,Shi Qing,Zhang Wen-zhi,Cai Shou-wang,Jiang Kai,&Dong Jia-hong.(2013).A meta-analysis of the long-term effects of chronic pancreatitis surgical treatments: duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy.CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL,126(1),147-153.
MLA Lu Wen-ping,et al."A meta-analysis of the long-term effects of chronic pancreatitis surgical treatments: duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy".CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL 126.1(2013):147-153.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 文献类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
A meta-analysis of t(477KB)期刊论文出版稿开放获取CC BY-NC-SA浏览 请求全文
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Lu Wen-ping]的文章
[Shi Qing]的文章
[Zhang Wen-zhi]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Lu Wen-ping]的文章
[Shi Qing]的文章
[Zhang Wen-zhi]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Lu Wen-ping]的文章
[Shi Qing]的文章
[Zhang Wen-zhi]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: A meta-analysis of the long-term effects of chronic pancreatitis surgical treatments duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。