北京大学医学部机构知识库
Advanced  
IR@PKUHSC  > 北京大学第一临床医学院  > 泌尿外科  > 期刊论文
学科主题: 临床医学
题名:
Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Renal Masses with Infrahepatic Tumor Thrombus: The Largest Series of Retroperitoneal Experience from China
作者: Xu, Ben1,2; Zhao, Qiang3; Jin, Jie1,2; He, Zhi-song1,2; Zhou, Li-qun1,2; Zhang, Qian1,2
刊名: JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY
发表日期: 2014-02-01
DOI: 10.1089/end.2013.0519
卷: 28, 期:2, 页:201-207
收录类别: SCI
文章类型: Article
WOS标题词: Science & Technology
类目[WOS]: Urology & Nephrology
研究领域[WOS]: Urology & Nephrology
关键词[WOS]: VENA-CAVAL THROMBECTOMY ; RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY ; CELL CARCINOMA ; LEVEL-II ; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE ; VEIN ; MANAGEMENT ; OUTCOMES
英文摘要:

Objective: To compare the treatment outcome of laparoscopic versus open surgery for renal masses with infrahepatic (levels I and II) tumor thrombus and analyze the largest series of retroperitoneal experience in such cases from China. Materials and Methods: Forty-nine patients with renal masses with infrahepatic tumor thrombus were analyzed retrospectively between January 2009 and January 2013 at our institution. The diagnosis was confirmed by computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging preoperatively. They were divided into two groups based on the detailed surgical approach applied. Group 1 (A, pure laparoscopic; B, laparoscopic nephrectomy with open thrombectomy) consisted of 17 patients (34.7%) and group 2 (pure open) consisted of 32 patients (65.3%). Results: The two groups were comparable with regard to all of the patients′ baseline characteristics. All operations were performed successfully without severe complications. In group 1, the mean operative time was 208.5 minutes, the mean estimated blood loss was 147.1mL, the mean postoperative hospital stay was 5.8 days, and only two patients (11.8%) accepted blood transfusion with a mean quantity of 300mL. In group 2, the figures were 268.3 minutes, 1345.3mL, 12.5 days, respectively, and a total of 17 patients (53.1%) received transfusion with a mean quantity of 1488.2mL. The differences of all these parameters were statistically significant between both groups (p<0.05). However, comparisons between the group 1A and 1B in all of the perioperative characteristics were not statistically significant. During a mean follow-up of 18.2 months, 13 patients in group 1 and 26 patients in group 2 survived. The difference in the cancer-survival rates between both groups was not statistically significant. Conclusions: Although it remains technically complex, demanding and challenging for renal masses with infrahepatic tumor thrombus, laparoscopic surgery with a retroperitoneal approach can make favorable perioperative results and comparable survival rates in selectively less complex patients compared with the traditional open surgery.

语种: 英语
WOS记录号: WOS:000330312200016
Citation statistics:
内容类型: 期刊论文
URI标识: http://ir.bjmu.edu.cn/handle/400002259/62885
Appears in Collections:北京大学第一临床医学院_泌尿外科_期刊论文

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: 1.Peking Univ, Inst Urol, Beijing 100034, Peoples R China
2.Peking Univ, Dept Urol, Natl Urol Canc Ctr, Hosp 1, Beijing 100034, Peoples R China
3.Peking Univ, Dept Urol, Canc Hosp, Beijing Canc Hosp & Inst, Beijing 100034, Peoples R China

Recommended Citation:
Xu, Ben,Zhao, Qiang,Jin, Jie,et al. Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Renal Masses with Infrahepatic Tumor Thrombus: The Largest Series of Retroperitoneal Experience from China[J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY,2014,28(2):201-207.
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Xu, Ben]'s Articles
[Zhao, Qiang]'s Articles
[Jin, Jie]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Xu, Ben]‘s Articles
[Zhao, Qiang]‘s Articles
[Jin, Jie]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

 

Valid XHTML 1.0!
Copyright © 2007-2017  北京大学医学部 - Feedback
Powered by CSpace