IR@PKUHSC  > 北京大学第一临床医学院  > 肾脏内科
学科主题临床医学
Comparison of Bioimpedance and Clinical Methods for Dry Weight Prediction in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients
Jian, Yusu1; Li, Xiang1,2,3,4; Cheng, Xuyang1; Chen, Yuqing1; Liu, Li1; Tao, Zhenhui1; Zuo, Li1,5
关键词Bioimpedance Dry weight Hemodialysis Single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis Spectroscopy
刊名BLOOD PURIFICATION
2014-07-01
DOI10.1159/000362109
37期:3页:214-220
收录类别SCI
文章类型Article
WOS标题词Science & Technology
类目[WOS]Hematology ; Urology & Nephrology
研究领域[WOS]Hematology ; Urology & Nephrology
关键词[WOS]BIOELECTRICAL-IMPEDANCE ANALYSIS ; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL ; GUIDED FLUID MANAGEMENT ; BODY-MASS INDEX ; VECTOR ANALYSIS ; FREQUENCY BIOIMPEDANCE ; DIALYSIS PATIENTS ; SPECTROSCOPY ; SINGLE ; EQUIVALENCE
英文摘要

Background: Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a promising technique to evaluate dry weight. We compared the dry weight calculated by the three BIA equations Carlo Basile (CB), Yanna Dou (YD) and the body composition spectroscopy (BCS) with clinical evaluation in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients. Methods: The dry weight of enrolled MHD patients (DWClin) was evaluated under strict clinical surveillance. The whole-body resistances at 50 kHz, intra- and extracellular resistances were measured to calculate the dry weight (DWCB, DWYD and DWBCS) using each of the three equations. Results: Neither DWCB nor DWBCS were statistically different compared to DWClin (DWCB 63.2 +/- 17.2 vs. 63.1 +/- 16.1 kg; DWBCS 62.8 +/- 16.8 vs. 63.1 +/- 16.1 kg, p > 0.05). DWYD was significantly lower than DWClin (DWYD 62.0 +/- 16.1 vs. 63.1 +/- 16.1 kg, p < 0.05). The bias between DWCB and DWClin was the smallest among these three methods (Delta DWCB -0.1 +/- 1.4 kg; Delta DWYD 1.1 +/- 2.9 kg; Delta DWBCS 0.3 +/- 1.8 kg). Conclusion: The CB equations have better consistency with clinical dry weight in MHD patients. (C) 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel

语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000339278500006
引用统计
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://ir.bjmu.edu.cn/handle/400002259/65006
专题北京大学第一临床医学院_肾脏内科
作者单位1.Peking Univ, Hosp 1, Inst Nephrol, Beijing, Peoples R China
2.Peking Union Med Coll, Fuwai Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
3.Peking Union Med Coll, Cardiovasc Inst, Beijing, Peoples R China
4.Chinese Acad Med Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
5.Peking Univ, Peoples Hosp, Dept Nephrol, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Jian, Yusu,Li, Xiang,Cheng, Xuyang,et al. Comparison of Bioimpedance and Clinical Methods for Dry Weight Prediction in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients[J]. BLOOD PURIFICATION,2014,37(3):214-220.
APA Jian, Yusu.,Li, Xiang.,Cheng, Xuyang.,Chen, Yuqing.,Liu, Li.,...&Zuo, Li.(2014).Comparison of Bioimpedance and Clinical Methods for Dry Weight Prediction in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients.BLOOD PURIFICATION,37(3),214-220.
MLA Jian, Yusu,et al."Comparison of Bioimpedance and Clinical Methods for Dry Weight Prediction in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients".BLOOD PURIFICATION 37.3(2014):214-220.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Jian, Yusu]的文章
[Li, Xiang]的文章
[Cheng, Xuyang]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Jian, Yusu]的文章
[Li, Xiang]的文章
[Cheng, Xuyang]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Jian, Yusu]的文章
[Li, Xiang]的文章
[Cheng, Xuyang]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。