IR@PKUHSC  > 北京大学第一临床医学院  > 肾脏内科
学科主题临床医学
Comparison of Bioimpedance and Clinical Methods for Dry Weight Prediction in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients
Jian, Yusu1; Li, Xiang1,2,3,4; Cheng, Xuyang1; Chen, Yuqing1; Liu, Li1; Tao, Zhenhui1; Zuo, Li1,5
关键词Bioimpedance Dry weight Hemodialysis Single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis Spectroscopy
刊名BLOOD PURIFICATION
2014-07-01
DOI10.1159/000362109
37期:3页:214-220
收录类别SCI
文章类型Article
WOS标题词Science & Technology
类目[WOS]Hematology ; Urology & Nephrology
研究领域[WOS]Hematology ; Urology & Nephrology
关键词[WOS]BIOELECTRICAL-IMPEDANCE ANALYSIS ; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL ; GUIDED FLUID MANAGEMENT ; BODY-MASS INDEX ; VECTOR ANALYSIS ; FREQUENCY BIOIMPEDANCE ; DIALYSIS PATIENTS ; SPECTROSCOPY ; SINGLE ; EQUIVALENCE
英文摘要

Background: Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a promising technique to evaluate dry weight. We compared the dry weight calculated by the three BIA equations Carlo Basile (CB), Yanna Dou (YD) and the body composition spectroscopy (BCS) with clinical evaluation in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients. Methods: The dry weight of enrolled MHD patients (DWClin) was evaluated under strict clinical surveillance. The whole-body resistances at 50 kHz, intra- and extracellular resistances were measured to calculate the dry weight (DWCB, DWYD and DWBCS) using each of the three equations. Results: Neither DWCB nor DWBCS were statistically different compared to DWClin (DWCB 63.2 +/- 17.2 vs. 63.1 +/- 16.1 kg; DWBCS 62.8 +/- 16.8 vs. 63.1 +/- 16.1 kg, p > 0.05). DWYD was significantly lower than DWClin (DWYD 62.0 +/- 16.1 vs. 63.1 +/- 16.1 kg, p < 0.05). The bias between DWCB and DWClin was the smallest among these three methods (Delta DWCB -0.1 +/- 1.4 kg; Delta DWYD 1.1 +/- 2.9 kg; Delta DWBCS 0.3 +/- 1.8 kg). Conclusion: The CB equations have better consistency with clinical dry weight in MHD patients. (C) 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel

语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000339278500006
Citation statistics
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://ir.bjmu.edu.cn/handle/400002259/65006
Collection北京大学第一临床医学院_肾脏内科
作者单位1.Peking Univ, Hosp 1, Inst Nephrol, Beijing, Peoples R China
2.Peking Union Med Coll, Fuwai Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
3.Peking Union Med Coll, Cardiovasc Inst, Beijing, Peoples R China
4.Chinese Acad Med Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
5.Peking Univ, Peoples Hosp, Dept Nephrol, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
Recommended Citation
GB/T 7714
Jian, Yusu,Li, Xiang,Cheng, Xuyang,et al. Comparison of Bioimpedance and Clinical Methods for Dry Weight Prediction in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients[J]. BLOOD PURIFICATION,2014,37(3):214-220.
APA Jian, Yusu.,Li, Xiang.,Cheng, Xuyang.,Chen, Yuqing.,Liu, Li.,...&Zuo, Li.(2014).Comparison of Bioimpedance and Clinical Methods for Dry Weight Prediction in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients.BLOOD PURIFICATION,37(3),214-220.
MLA Jian, Yusu,et al."Comparison of Bioimpedance and Clinical Methods for Dry Weight Prediction in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients".BLOOD PURIFICATION 37.3(2014):214-220.
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Related Services
Recommend this item
Bookmark
Usage statistics
Export to Endnote
谷歌学术
谷歌学术Similar articles in
[Jian, Yusu]'s Articles
[Li, Xiang]'s Articles
[Cheng, Xuyang]'s Articles
百度学术
百度学术Similar articles in
[Jian, Yusu]'s Articles
[Li, Xiang]'s Articles
[Cheng, Xuyang]'s Articles
必应学术
必应学术Similar articles in
[Jian, Yusu]'s Articles
[Li, Xiang]'s Articles
[Cheng, Xuyang]'s Articles
Terms of Use
No data!
Social Bookmark/Share
All comments (0)
No comment.
 

Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.