学科主题临床医学
Performance Comparison of the Versant HCV Genotype 2.0 Assay (LiPA) and the Abbott Realtime HCV Genotype II Assay for Detecting Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 6
Yang, Ruifeng; Cong, Xu; Du, Shaocai; Fei, Ran; Rao, Huiying; Wei, Lai
刊名JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
2014-10-01
DOI10.1128/JCM.00882-14
52期:10页:3685-3692
收录类别SCI
文章类型Article
WOS标题词Science & Technology
类目[WOS]Microbiology
研究领域[WOS]Microbiology
关键词[WOS]LINE PROBE ASSAY ; SEQUENCE-ANALYSIS ; NS5B REGION ; GENERAL-POPULATION ; TMC435 MONOTHERAPY ; HIGH PREVALENCE ; HONG-KONG ; SUBTYPES ; CLASSIFICATION ; VARIANTS
英文摘要

The Versant HCV genotype 2.0 assay (line probe assay [LiPA] 2.0), based on reverse hybridization, and the Abbott Realtime HCV genotype II assay (Realtime II), based on genotype-specific real-time PCR, have been widely used to analyze hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes. However, their performances for detecting HCV genotype 6 infections have not been well studied. Here, we analyzed genotype 6 in 63 samples from the China HCV Genotyping Study that were originally identified as genotype 6 using the LiPA 2.0. The genotyping results were confirmed by nonstructural 5B (NS5B) or core sequence phylogenetic analysis. A total of 57 samples were confirmed to be genotype 6 (51 genotype 6a, 5 genotype 6n, and 1 genotype 6e). Four samples identified as a mixture of genotypes 6 and 4 by the LiPA 2.0 were confirmed to be genotype 3b. The remaining two samples classified as genotype 6 by the LiPA 2.0 were confirmed to be genotype 1b, which were intergenotypic recombinants and excluded from further comparison. In 57 genotype 6 samples detected using the Realtime II version 2.00 assay, 47 genotype 6a samples were identified as genotype 6, one 6e sample was misclassified as genotype 1, and four 6a and five 6n samples yielded indeterminate results. Nine nucleotide profiles in the 5′ untranslated region affected the performances of both assays. Therefore, our analysis shows that both assays have limitations in identifying HCV genotype 6. The LiPA 2.0 cannot distinguish some 3b samples from genotype 6 samples. The Realtime II assay fails to identify some 6a and all non-6a subtypes, and it misclassifies genotype 6e as genotype 1.

语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000342371700023
项目编号2012ZX10002003 ; 2012ZX10002005 ; 2012ZX09303019 ; RDC2012-06
资助机构China National Science and Technology Major Project for Infectious Diseases Control ; Major Project of National Science and Technology "Creation of major new drugs" ; Peking University People&prime ; s Hospital Research and Development Funds ; Bristol-Myers Squibb
引用统计
被引频次:17[WOS]   [WOS记录]     [WOS相关记录]
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://ir.bjmu.edu.cn/handle/400002259/65316
专题北京大学第二临床医学院_北京大学肝病研究所
作者单位Peking Univ, Peoples Hosp, Inst Hepatol, Beijing Key Lab Hepatitis C & Immunotherapy Liver, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Yang, Ruifeng,Cong, Xu,Du, Shaocai,et al. Performance Comparison of the Versant HCV Genotype 2.0 Assay (LiPA) and the Abbott Realtime HCV Genotype II Assay for Detecting Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 6[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY,2014,52(10):3685-3692.
APA Yang, Ruifeng,Cong, Xu,Du, Shaocai,Fei, Ran,Rao, Huiying,&Wei, Lai.(2014).Performance Comparison of the Versant HCV Genotype 2.0 Assay (LiPA) and the Abbott Realtime HCV Genotype II Assay for Detecting Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 6.JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY,52(10),3685-3692.
MLA Yang, Ruifeng,et al."Performance Comparison of the Versant HCV Genotype 2.0 Assay (LiPA) and the Abbott Realtime HCV Genotype II Assay for Detecting Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 6".JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY 52.10(2014):3685-3692.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Yang, Ruifeng]的文章
[Cong, Xu]的文章
[Du, Shaocai]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Yang, Ruifeng]的文章
[Cong, Xu]的文章
[Du, Shaocai]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Yang, Ruifeng]的文章
[Cong, Xu]的文章
[Du, Shaocai]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。