IR@PKUHSC  > 北京大学第一临床医学院  > 皮肤性病科
学科主题临床医学
A comparison of adapalene gel 0.1% vs. tretinoin gel 0.025% in the treatment of acne vulgaris in China
Tu, P; Li, GQ; Zhu, XJ; Zheng, J; Wong, WZ
关键词adapalene tretinoin acne vulgaris Chinese patients
刊名JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY
2001
suppl.3页:31-36
收录类别SCI
文章类型Article
WOS标题词Science & Technology
类目[WOS]Dermatology
研究领域[WOS]Dermatology
关键词[WOS]AZELAIC ACID CREAM ; TOPICAL TREATMENT ; RETINOIC ACID ; SKIN ; MELASMA ; LASER
英文摘要

Aim To compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of adapalene gel 0.1% vs. tretinoin gel 0.025% in a Chinese patient population.

Background Although acne vulgaris is a common problem among Asians and Asian-Americans, little has been published on the specific manifestations, sequelae, and treatment-responsivness of this disorder in Asian skin types. Since Asian skin types tend to be more highly pigmented than those of white people of European descent, many Asians share the predisposition toward post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation seen in Africans,African-Americans and other dark-skinned peoples. It is generally assumed that the efficacy and safety of topical retinoids is the same in Asians as in white people. Tretinoin has been available in China for decades; adapalene became available in 1998.

Methods A total of 150 patients with grade II-III acne vulgaris seen at three dermatology clinics were randomized to 8 weeks of daily treatment with either adapalene gel 0.1% or tretinoin gel 0.025%. Counts of total lesions, inflammatory lesions and non-inflammatory lesions were made at baseline and again at treatment weeks 21, 4, 6 and 8. Global assessment ratings, based on percent lesion reduction from baseline were also made. Erythema, burning, pruritus, scaling and dryness were rated on a 0-3 severity scale.

Results A total of 139 patients completed the efficacy evaluation, and 144 patients completed the safety evaluation. Both adapalene and tretinoin produce dramatic reductions in total, inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesion counts, in the range of 69-74% on average. More than 70% of patients in both groups had complete clearance or marked improvement. In general, irritation was mild, but was both more common and more severe in the tretinoin group vs. the adapalene group. No systemic side effects were seen.

Conclusions Adapalene offers comparable efficacy to tretinoin, but is less irritating. It represents a good alternative for the treatment of mild to moderate acne vulgaris in Chinese patients.

语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000173291000006
引用统计
被引频次:20[WOS]   [WOS记录]     [WOS相关记录]
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://ir.bjmu.edu.cn/handle/400002259/66671
专题北京大学第一临床医学院_皮肤性病科
作者单位1.Peking Univ, First Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Beijing 100034, Peoples R China
2.Shanghai Med Univ 2, Rue Jin Hosp, Shanghai, Peoples R China
3.First Hosp, Wuhan, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Tu, P,Li, GQ,Zhu, XJ,et al. A comparison of adapalene gel 0.1% vs. tretinoin gel 0.025% in the treatment of acne vulgaris in China[J]. JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY,2001,suppl.3:31-36.
APA Tu, P,Li, GQ,Zhu, XJ,Zheng, J,&Wong, WZ.(2001).A comparison of adapalene gel 0.1% vs. tretinoin gel 0.025% in the treatment of acne vulgaris in China.JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY,suppl.3,31-36.
MLA Tu, P,et al."A comparison of adapalene gel 0.1% vs. tretinoin gel 0.025% in the treatment of acne vulgaris in China".JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY suppl.3(2001):31-36.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Tu, P]的文章
[Li, GQ]的文章
[Zhu, XJ]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Tu, P]的文章
[Li, GQ]的文章
[Zhu, XJ]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Tu, P]的文章
[Li, GQ]的文章
[Zhu, XJ]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。