IR@PKUHSC  > 北京大学第一临床医学院  > 内分泌内科
学科主题临床医学
Evaluation of a new durable insulin pen with memory function among people with diabetes and healthcare professionals
Guo, Xiaohui1; Sommavilla, Baerbel2; Vanterpool, Grace3; Qvist, Marianne4; Bethien, Matthias5; Lilleore, Soren Kruse4
关键词diabetes ease of use insulin pen memory function
刊名EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DELIVERY
2012-04-01
DOI10.1517/17425247.2012.671808
9期:4页:355-366
收录类别SCI
文章类型Article
WOS标题词Science & Technology
类目[WOS]Pharmacology & Pharmacy
研究领域[WOS]Pharmacology & Pharmacy
关键词[WOS]GLYCEMIC CONTROL ; NOVOPEN(R) 4 ; CONVENTIONAL VIAL/SYRINGE ; INJECTION FORCE ; ACCURACY ; PREFERENCE ; ADHERENCE ; DELIVERY ; TYPE-1 ; SYRINGES
英文摘要

Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate durable insulin pens among people with diabetes (PwD) and healthcare professionals (HCPs), by comparing two durable insulin pens with memory function: NovoPen (R) 5 (NP5) and HumaPen (R) Memoir (TM) (HPM), and two durable insulin pens without memory function: HumaPen Luxura (R) (HPL) and ClikSTAR (R) (CS).

Research design and methods: This cross-over, multicentre usability test was conducted in China, Germany and the UK. Participants evaluated all four pens in randomised order by performing handling and usability tasks related to everyday use during a face-to-face interview. Tasks, pens and preferences were rated by completing a questionnaire comprising of rating and open-ended questions.

Results: NP5 was preferred by 51% of participants compared with HPM (22%, p < 0.01), HPL (12%, p < 0.01) and CS (15%, p < 0.01). Participants preferred the design of NP5 (in particular, appearance, length and robustness). Memory function for the two pens was rated equally by participants, but 54% of PwD rated NP5 as ′very easy′ to learn to use versus 22% for HPM and significantly more HCPs found it ′very easy′ to teach patients to use NP5 versus HPM (6-point rating scale; difference in mean score, p < 0.01). Substantially, more PwD would be confident in using NP5 (64%) compared with HPM (43%), HPL (49%) and CS (45%) (6-point rating scale; difference in mean score, p < 0.01).

Conclusions: NP5 was preferred by > 50% of PwD and HCPs. NP5 was more highly rated for design, memory function and ease of learning/teaching compared with HPM. Most PwD would be confident in using NP5 for administering daily insulin injections.

语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000301835800001
引用统计
被引频次:7[WOS]   [WOS记录]     [WOS相关记录]
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://ir.bjmu.edu.cn/handle/400002259/67104
专题北京大学第一临床医学院_内分泌内科
作者单位1.CLCH Diabet, Intermediate Serv, London W14 0LJ, England
2.Novo Nordisk AS, DK-2860 Soborg, Denmark
3.GfK SirValUse Consulting GmbH, Hamburg, Germany
4.Peking Univ First Hosp, Dept Endocrinol, Beijing 100034, Peoples R China
5.Paracelsus Med Univ, Gen Hosp, Ctr Prevent & Care, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Guo, Xiaohui,Sommavilla, Baerbel,Vanterpool, Grace,et al. Evaluation of a new durable insulin pen with memory function among people with diabetes and healthcare professionals[J]. EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DELIVERY,2012,9(4):355-366.
APA Guo, Xiaohui,Sommavilla, Baerbel,Vanterpool, Grace,Qvist, Marianne,Bethien, Matthias,&Lilleore, Soren Kruse.(2012).Evaluation of a new durable insulin pen with memory function among people with diabetes and healthcare professionals.EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DELIVERY,9(4),355-366.
MLA Guo, Xiaohui,et al."Evaluation of a new durable insulin pen with memory function among people with diabetes and healthcare professionals".EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DELIVERY 9.4(2012):355-366.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Guo, Xiaohui]的文章
[Sommavilla, Baerbel]的文章
[Vanterpool, Grace]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Guo, Xiaohui]的文章
[Sommavilla, Baerbel]的文章
[Vanterpool, Grace]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Guo, Xiaohui]的文章
[Sommavilla, Baerbel]的文章
[Vanterpool, Grace]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。