北京大学医学部机构知识库
Advanced  
IR@PKUHSC  > 北京大学第二临床医学院  > 胃肠外科  > 期刊论文
学科主题: 临床医学
题名:
Prospective controlled study of the safety and oncological outcomes of ELAPE procure with definitive anatomic landmarks versus conventional APE for lower rectal cancer
作者: Shen, Z.; Ye, Y.; Zhang, X.; Xie, Q.; Yin, M.; Yang, X.; Jiang, K.; Liang, B.; Wang, S.
关键词: Rectal cancer ; Extralevator abdominoperineal excision ; ELAPE
刊名: EJSO
发表日期: 2015-04-01
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.01.017
卷: 41, 期:4, 页:472-477
收录类别: SCI
文章类型: Article
WOS标题词: Science & Technology
类目[WOS]: Oncology ; Surgery
研究领域[WOS]: Oncology ; Surgery
关键词[WOS]: EXTRALEVATOR ABDOMINOPERINEAL EXCISION ; COLORECTAL-CANCER ; RESECTION ; SURGERY ; EXPERIENCE ; MULTICENTER ; QUALITY
英文摘要:

Background: The use of extra-levator abdominoperineal resection (ELAPE) procedure for lower rectal cancer is controversial. It is unclear whether the ELAPE procedure could improve surgical safety and lead to better oncological outcomes.

Methods: Sixty-nine lower rectal cancer patients who underwent ELAPE (36 cases) or conventional abdominoperineal resection (APE; 33 cases) between June 2011 and February 2013 were prospectively investigated. Clinicopathological variables including blood loss, intraoperative perforation (TOP) rate, circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement, lymph node harvest, the postoperative complications, urinary and sexual function, quality of life (QOL), local recurrence rate and survival were recorded and compared.

Results: Blood loss (P = 0.021), perineal wound complication (P = 0.039), IOP rate (P = 0.028), local recurrence (P = 0.034) were significantly less frequent in the ELAPE group. There was greater CRM involvement in the conventional APE group but no statistical difference between the two groups. Urinary function, sexual function and QOL were not significantly different between the two groups. Overall survival and progression-free survival were not significantly different between two groups, even when survival was analyzed according to TNM stage, T stage, N stage, and with or without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. In patients who underwent ELAPE there was no statistical difference in postoperative complications between younger and elderly patients (age >= 60).

Conclusions: ELAPE procedure with definitive anatomic landmarks demonstrated surgical safety and decreased local recurrence for lower rectal cancer patients including the elderly, but there were no survival improvements in compared to conventional APE procedure. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

语种: 英语
WOS记录号: WOS:000353097700007
Citation statistics:
内容类型: 期刊论文
URI标识: http://ir.bjmu.edu.cn/handle/400002259/67148
Appears in Collections:北京大学第二临床医学院_胃肠外科_期刊论文

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: Peking Univ, Peoples Hosp, Dept Surg Gastroenterol, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China

Recommended Citation:
Shen, Z.,Ye, Y.,Zhang, X.,et al. Prospective controlled study of the safety and oncological outcomes of ELAPE procure with definitive anatomic landmarks versus conventional APE for lower rectal cancer[J]. EJSO,2015,41(4):472-477.
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Shen, Z.]'s Articles
[Ye, Y.]'s Articles
[Zhang, X.]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Shen, Z.]‘s Articles
[Ye, Y.]‘s Articles
[Zhang, X.]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

 

Valid XHTML 1.0!
Copyright © 2007-2017  北京大学医学部 - Feedback
Powered by CSpace