IR@PKUHSC  > 北京大学第二临床医学院  > 泌尿外科
学科主题临床医学
Retrograde, Antegrade, and Laparoscopic Approaches to the Management of Large Upper Ureteral Stones After Shockwave Lithotripsy Failure: A Four-Year Retrospective Study
Zhu, Hongjian1; Ye, Xiongjun2; Xiao, Xuren1; Chen, Xianglong1; Zhang, Qingjiang1; Wang, Hua1
刊名JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY
2014
DOI10.1089/end.2013.0391
28期:1页:100-103
收录类别SCI
文章类型Article
WOS标题词Science & Technology
类目[WOS]Urology & Nephrology
研究领域[WOS]Urology & Nephrology
关键词[WOS]PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY ; SEMIRIGID URETEROSCOPY ; URETEROLITHOTOMY ; COMPLICATIONS ; DISEASE
英文摘要

Purpose: We compare the success rate and complications of retrograde ureteroscopy, laparoscopic ureterolithotomy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the management of large upper ureteral stones. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 73 patients with large (1cm) upper ureteral stones at two institutions from January 2010 to May 2013. Twenty-two patients underwent retrograde ureteroscopy (group ULS), 30 patients underwent percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (group PCNL), and 21 patients underwent laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (group LS) for removal of upper ureteral stones. CT, intravenous urography, and ultrasound were performed 1 week and 1 month after surgical removal. Results: There were no significant differences in age, sex, or stone size among the three groups. Mean estimated blood loss and mean hospital stay showed a statistically significant difference among the three groups. Success rates in the PCNL, LS, and ULS groups were 100%, 90.5%, and 77.3%, respectively. The procedures of two patients in group LS were converted to open surgery because of the inability to find the ureteral stone in one patient and an adhesion too difficult to dissect in the other. The procedures of two patients in the ULS group were converted to LS, and those of three patients were converted to PCNL because of severe edema impaction at the site of the stone, a sharply angulated ureter obstruction, upward migration of the stone (seven patients), and intraoperative complications (two patients). Conclusions: Percutaneous antegrade nephrolithotomy is a safe and effective minimally invasive treatment for patients with large upper ureteral stones that has several advantages over retrograde ureteroscopy and laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. Thus, percutaneous antegrade nephrolithotomy is recommended as a safe and good treatment option for large upper ureteral stones. A combined procedure (e.g., ureteral push-back and percutaneous removal) can be considered in some patients.

语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000329361400018
引用统计
被引频次:10[WOS]   [WOS记录]     [WOS相关记录]
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://ir.bjmu.edu.cn/handle/400002259/68010
专题北京大学第二临床医学院_泌尿外科
作者单位1.Gen Hosp Armed Police Forces China, Dept Urol, Beijing, Peoples R China
2.Peking Univ Peoples Hosp, Dept Urol, Beijing 100034, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Zhu, Hongjian,Ye, Xiongjun,Xiao, Xuren,et al. Retrograde, Antegrade, and Laparoscopic Approaches to the Management of Large Upper Ureteral Stones After Shockwave Lithotripsy Failure: A Four-Year Retrospective Study[J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY,2014,28(1):100-103.
APA Zhu, Hongjian,Ye, Xiongjun,Xiao, Xuren,Chen, Xianglong,Zhang, Qingjiang,&Wang, Hua.(2014).Retrograde, Antegrade, and Laparoscopic Approaches to the Management of Large Upper Ureteral Stones After Shockwave Lithotripsy Failure: A Four-Year Retrospective Study.JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY,28(1),100-103.
MLA Zhu, Hongjian,et al."Retrograde, Antegrade, and Laparoscopic Approaches to the Management of Large Upper Ureteral Stones After Shockwave Lithotripsy Failure: A Four-Year Retrospective Study".JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY 28.1(2014):100-103.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Zhu, Hongjian]的文章
[Ye, Xiongjun]的文章
[Xiao, Xuren]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Zhu, Hongjian]的文章
[Ye, Xiongjun]的文章
[Xiao, Xuren]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Zhu, Hongjian]的文章
[Ye, Xiongjun]的文章
[Xiao, Xuren]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。