IR@PKUHSC  > 北京大学第三临床医学院  > 呼吸科
学科主题呼吸内科学
哮喘豚鼠气道重塑与气道反应性的图像分析
其他题名Image analysis of airway remodeling and responsiveness in asthmatic guinea pig
章晓初; 姚婉贞; 赵鸣武; 何其华; 陈月
关键词哮喘 气道重塑 气道反应性 图像分析
刊名中华结核和呼吸杂志
2001
24期:2页:87-89
收录类别中国科技核心期刊 ; 中文核心期刊 ; CSCD
文章类型Journal Article
摘要目的研究哮喘豚鼠气道重塑的机制及气道反应性的变化。方法实验分二组:对照组(20只)和哮喘组(20只),取双肺与不同刺激因素作用后作组织切片、HE染色,通过图像分析仪测定支气管内周长、管壁厚度、外周长,并计算平滑肌收缩百分比(PMS)。结果(1)哮喘组支气管壁厚度(WA/Pi)为(10.0±2.0)μm2/μm,支气管壁平滑肌厚度(平滑肌的面积/Pi)为(4.8±1.5)μm2/μm,对照组WA/Pi为(7.9±2.1)μm2/μm,平滑肌的面积/Pi为(3.1±2.0)μm2/μm,两组比较差异均有显著性(P<0.01),支气管壁平滑肌细胞核数量(N/Pi)哮喘组为(0.012 3±0.002 7)个/μm,对照组为(0.010±0.003)个/μm,两组比较差异有显著性(P<0.05)。(2)哮喘组气道平滑肌对腺苷的反应性(以PMS表示)为0.34±0.07,对照组为0.29±0.08,两组比较差异有显著性(P<0.05),联用氨茶碱和腺苷后,哮喘组PMS为0.26±0.07,与单用腺苷组(0.34±0.07)比较差异有显著性(P<0.01)。(3)在Ach作用下哮喘组的PMS为0.24±0.04,对照组为0.19±0.06,两组比较差异有显著性(P<0.05),联用肝素和Ach后,哮喘组PMS为0.20±0.04,与单用Ach组(0.24±0.04)比较差异有显著性(P<0.05)。结论哮喘气道平滑肌增生是气道重塑的主要原因,氨茶碱和肝素可以抑制气道对腺苷和乙酰胆碱的反应性。 Objective To observe the mechanism of airway remodeling and changes of airway responsiveness in guinea pig model of asthma. Methods 40 guinea pigs were randomly divided into two groups: control (20)and asthmatic group (20). After incubating with different stimulus, bilateral lung tissue section were stained with HE. Using image analysis system to measure the airway internal perimeter, wall area, external perimeter, etc. and calculate percentage of muscle shortening (PMS) according to formula. Results (1) The airway wall thickness (WA/Pi) in asthmatic group and control group were (10.0±2.0 )and (7.9±2.1) μm2/μm, respectively. The bronchial smooth muscle thickness in asthmatic group and control group were (4.8±1.5 )and (3.1±2.0) μm2/μm, respectively. Both were statistically significant (P<0.01). The number of bronchial smooth muscle nucleus in asthmatic group (0.012 3±0.002 7/μm) was higher compared with control (0.010±0.003/μm) (P<0.05). (2) Responsiveness of airway smooth muscle to adenosine (represented by PMS) in asthmatic group and control were 0.34±0.07 and 0.29±0.08,respectively (P<0.05). When combined with aminophyline, PMS in asthmatic group was 0.26±0.07. There was statistically significant difference when compared with adenosine alone (0.34±0.07) (P<0.01). (3) PMS to acetylcholine in asthmatic group and control were 0.24±0.04 and 0.19±0.06, respectively (P<0.05). When combined with heparin, PMS in asthmatic group was 0.20±0.04. There was statistically significant difference when compared with acetylcholine alone (0.24±0.04 ) (P<0.05).Conclusions The main reason of airway remodeling in asthma is due to bronchial smooth muscle hyperplasia. Aminophylline and heparin may inhibit the responsiveness of airway to adenosine and acetylcholine respectively.
语种中文
原文出处查看原文
引用统计
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://ir.bjmu.edu.cn/handle/400002259/71278
专题北京大学第三临床医学院_呼吸科
作者单位1.北京大学第三医院呼吸科
2.北京大学医学部医药分析中心
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
章晓初,姚婉贞,赵鸣武,等. 哮喘豚鼠气道重塑与气道反应性的图像分析[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志,2001,24(2):87-89.
APA 章晓初,姚婉贞,赵鸣武,何其华,&陈月.(2001).哮喘豚鼠气道重塑与气道反应性的图像分析.中华结核和呼吸杂志,24(2),87-89.
MLA 章晓初,et al."哮喘豚鼠气道重塑与气道反应性的图像分析".中华结核和呼吸杂志 24.2(2001):87-89.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[章晓初]的文章
[姚婉贞]的文章
[赵鸣武]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[章晓初]的文章
[姚婉贞]的文章
[赵鸣武]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[章晓初]的文章
[姚婉贞]的文章
[赵鸣武]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。