北京大学医学部机构知识库
Advanced  
IR@PKUHSC  > 北京大学第三临床医学院  > 介入血管外科  > 期刊论文
学科主题: 血管外科学
题名:
介入联合手术治疗急性髂股静脉血栓形成
其他题名: Intervention combined surgery for the treatment of acute iliofemoral vein thrombosis
作者: 李天润; 李选; 翟国钧; 张龙; 庄金满; 韩金涛; 冯琦琛
关键词: 静脉血栓形成 ; 放射学,介入性 ; 血栓溶解疗法 ; Venous thrombosis ; Radiology,interventional ; Thrombolytic therapy
刊名: 中华普通外科杂志
发表日期: 2011
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-631X.2011.10.015
卷: 26, 期:10, 页:845-848
收录类别: 中国科技核心期刊 ; 中文核心期刊 ; CSCD
文章类型: Journal Article
摘要: 目的 分析介入联合手术治疗(intervention combined surgical therapy,IST)急性髂股静脉血栓形成(deep vein thrombosis,DVT)的效果.方法 回顾性分析行介入导管取栓溶栓(catheter-directed pharmacomechanical thrombolysis,CDPT)和IST治疗的61例急性髂股DVT患者的临床资料.结果 61例患者中CDPT组47例,IST组14例.IST组中双侧髂股DVT 3例,1个月内有骨科、妇科手术史者5例,逆行进入患侧髂股静脉困难者3例.术后出院时,CDPT组水肿缓解有效率为93.6%,IST组为94.1%;CDPT组1例患者出现黑便,IST组1例患者出现切口血肿.术后14~37个月随访,CDPT组水肿缓解有效率为85.0%,IST组为85.7%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(x2=0.004,P=0.948);术后CDPT组1例患者出现足靴区色素沉着;BUS检查CDPT组静脉通畅率为52.6%,IST组为84.6%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(x2=4.157,P=0.041).结论 IST与CDPT比较,水肿缓解率相似,血栓复发率较低.在双侧急性髂股DVT、具溶栓禁忌证或逆行进入患侧髂股静脉困难的情况下,应考虑采用IST治疗急性髂股DVT. Objective To compare two treatment methods for acute iliofemoral vein thrombosis:c atheter-directed pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (CDPT,47 cases) and intervention combined surgicaltherapy( IST,14 cases).Methods This study includes 61 patients of acute iliofemoral vein thrombosis treated by CDPT or IST.All discharged cases were followed up by telephone for a period of 14 -37 months.Results Among the 61 patients (64 extremities),47 (forty-seven extremities) treated by CDPT,and 14 cases (seventeen extremities) treated by IST.The IST group included three patients of bilateral iliofemoral vein thrombosis,five patients on postoperative status within one month,and three patients in which the iliofemoral vein was not accessible.When discharged from hospital,the effective rate of edema relief is 93.6% in CDPT group while that is 94.1% in IST group; Melena occurred in one patient of CDPT group and incision hematoma occurred in one patient of IST group.According to the results of 14 -37 months follow-up,the effective rate of edema relief is 85.0% in CDPT group while that is 85.7% in IST group ( x2 =0.004 and the P =0.948).Calf pigmentation occurred in only one patient of CDPT group.The patency rate of vein by BUS examination is 52.6% in CDPT group while that is 84.6% in IST group x2 =4.157,P =0.041 ).Conclusions Comparing with CDPT group,IST group has the similar effective rate of edema relief,but has higher patency rate of iliofemoral vein.In case of bilateral acute iliofemoral vein thrombosis,in patients in whom thrombolysis is contraindicated,or when the iliofemoral vein is not accessible,IST is the treatment of choice for acute iliofemoral vein thrombosis.
语种: 中文
原文出处: 查看原文
Citation statistics:
内容类型: 期刊论文
URI标识: http://ir.bjmu.edu.cn/handle/400002259/71714
Appears in Collections:北京大学第三临床医学院_介入血管外科_期刊论文

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: 100191,北京大学第三医院介入血管外科

Recommended Citation:
李天润,李选,翟国钧,等. 介入联合手术治疗急性髂股静脉血栓形成[J]. 中华普通外科杂志,2011,26(10):845-848.
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[李天润]'s Articles
[李选]'s Articles
[翟国钧]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[李天润]‘s Articles
[李选]‘s Articles
[翟国钧]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

 

Valid XHTML 1.0!
Copyright © 2007-2017  北京大学医学部 - Feedback
Powered by CSpace